Gambling is not the "painless" tax that gambling promoters like to claim. Rather, it is a highly regressive form of taxation that thrives by inducing false hopes among the financially destitute. Government's multibillion-dollar annual take from gambling activities comes disproportionately from the pockets of America's poor. This has been most clearly evidenced in numerous statewide studies of lottery behavior over the last couple of decades. However, as casinos, racetracks and the like are made more accessible, it has become increasingly clear that all forms of gambling prey heavily on those with meager financial resources.

• A 1996 Mississippi State University study found that poor Mississippians living in counties with casinos lost a far greater percentage of their income in the casinos than did wealthier gamblers. Gamblers earning less than $10,000 per year lost about 10 percent of their family income to casinos, while those earning more than $40,000 spent only about 1 percent of their earnings on casino gambling. (William Rivenbark and Don Slabach, "Who Pays to Play? Voluntary Tax Incidence and Mississippi Gaming," Mississippi State University, the John C. Stennis Institute of Government, July 1996, p.33.)
• In a 1994 survey, 50 percent of Wisconsin casino gamblers reported an annual household income below $30,000.(William Thompson, Ricardo Gazel and Dan Rickman, "The Economic Impact of Native American Gaming in Wisconsin," Wisconsin Policy Research Institute Report, April 1995, p.23.) (Note: The median income in Wisconsin that year was $35,400.(U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1996 (116th edition) Washington, DC, 1996, p.465.))
• A study of 1,800 Minnesotans in state-run gambling treatment programs found that 52 percent had yearly incomes of $20,000 or less. The study also discovered that the amount of debt, as a proportion of income, was highest among the poorest gamblers seeking treatment. (Pat Doyle, "Compulsive Gambling Hitting Poor Hardest, New State Study Says," Minneapolis Star Tribune, July 25, 1997, p. 1B.)
• University of North Florida researchers reported: "Gambling expenditures in Las Vegas indicate a regressive pattern for gambling taxes because the percentage of household income devoted to gambling falls consistently as income rises." For instance, Las Vegas casino gamblers with household annual incomes of less than $10,000 lost 3.25 percent of their income to casino gambling. Those with annual incomes between $50,000 and $60,000, by comparison, lost only .8 percent of their income to the casinos. (Mary O. Borg, Paul M. Mason and Stephen L. Shapiro, "The Incidence of Taxes on Casino Gambling: Exploiting the Tired and Poor," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, July 1991, pp.323-332.)
• Seven percent of Illinois casino gamblers surveyed reported annual incomes below $10,000. Half of these individuals reported losing at least $1,900 to the casinos in the previous year. (Better Government Association, "Statement of J. Terrence Brunner, Executive Director," November 3, 1995.)
• The 32 Colorado counties with the highest per-capita lottery sales all have per-capita income levels below the state average. (Genevieve Anton, "Money Bet on a Miracle," Colorado Springs Gazette Telegraph, August 25, 1996, p. A1.)
• In New York, those living in the most impoverished areas of the state spent eight times more of their income on lottery tickets than did those living in the most affluent sections. (Ford Fessenden and John Riley, "And the Poor Get Poorer ...," Newsday, December 4, 1995, p. A7.)
• Almost half (49 percent) of California lottery players have household incomes below $35,000. (Jennifer Warren, "Bill Would Force Lottery Winners to Repay Aid," Los Angeles Times, March 23, 1997, p. A3.)
• The three poorest counties in New Mexico all rank among the state's top 10 counties in per-capita lottery sales. New Mexico's wealthiest county accounts for the fewest lottery ticket purchases per resident. (Carla Crowder, "N.M. Lottery Costs Rank High," Albuquerque Journal, April 27, 1997, p. A13.)
• An Associated Press survey of Wisconsin lottery purchases found that residents living in the poorest neighborhoods in the state spent, on average, four times as much of their income on lottery tickets as did those in wealthier neighborhoods. (Lottery Claims Bigger Slice of Poor's Income," Chicago Tribune, May 26, 1995, sec. "News," p.3.)
• A University of Louisville study showed that Kentuckians with annual incomes less than $15,000 spent $9.23 per week on lottery tickets, while those earning above $35,000 spent only $7.36. (Sheldon Shafer, "Blacks and Poor Spend More Money on Lottery, Study Says," Louisville Courier-Journal, June 29, 1994, p. 1B. (Note: Based on weeks in which respondents played the lottery.))
• A Texas A&M study found that the lowest-income group of Texans, who earn only 2 percent of the state's total income, provide 10 percent of the lottery's revenue. (Crystal Humphress, "Survey Shows Poor Lose More to Lottery'," Dallas Morning News, March 10, 1994, p. 16A.)
• Research among Maryland's largest counties revealed that per-capita lottery sales are highest in the state's poorest county, while the richest county has the lowest per-capita lottery sales. (Blaine Harden, "Addiction: Are States Preying on the Vulnerable?," Washington Post, March 4, 1996, p. Al.)
• The 1976 U.S. federal gambling commission found that the poorest Americans spend three times as much of their income on gambling compared to the wealthiest Americans. (Commission on the Review of the National Policy Toward Gambling, "Gambling in America," 1976, p.65.)